Make your own free website on Tripod.com


2002


2002 to 2003

Abbey Road Studios (probably Studio Two/Penthouse Mixing Suite). Mixing/Editing (precise mixing details unknown) : 'Get Back'; 'Dig A Pony'; 'For You Blue'; 'The Long And Winding Road'; 'Two Of Us'; 'I've Got A Feeling'; 'One After 909'; 'Don't Let Me Down'; 'I Me Mine'; 'Across The Universe'; 'Let It Be'.

P: Paul Hicks, Guy Massey, Allan Rouse (original sessions produced by The Beatles and George Martin) E: Glyn Johns.


In 2002 work began on a 'remix' of the original January 1969 GET BACK/LET IT BE sessions, initially planned to accompany a restored DVD release of the film.

Engineers Allan Rouse, Paul Hicks and Guy Massey were commissioned by Apple to comb through the original 1969 reels of tape, which had been recorded through a pair of borrowed 4-track consoles onto a 3M 8-track machine, and assemble a new version of the album. Further tapes from 1968 (Across The Universe) and 1970 (I Me Mine) also had to pulled from the shelves. Upon listening to the tapes, they were transferred into Pro Tools 5.2 using a Prism Sound Dream ADA 8 A/D converter. A small amount of de-noising was done using an analog Behringer dynamic filter.

Allan Rouse: "The main mixing was done in August (2002). We were prepping it before that; actually we probably started properly the beginning of last year (2002). The first thing was that we knew we were making a new album. And therefore there was no reference made to the old album, because there was no point. So the first thing that Paul and Guy did was they went through all of the eight tracks and listened to every title and take and version of each title again, to make sure that we had the best. It's about 30 reels of tape, half an hour of tape; so it's a few days of listening. We mainly listened to identify the takes they used. As it turns out, Glyn and Phil had done most of the legwork. We ended up using the vast majority of their takes. Now there's a lot of people that think that remixing is the wrong thing to do. But we're not remixing to change it, we're remixing it to make it sound better. What's happened here is that the difference between this and any other previous projects is that, whilst remixing it, we're still trying to make everybody think they're still listening to the same thing but they're just hearing it better. But we treated this as a new project. And there were no guidelines."

Paul Hicks: "I thought it was exciting; as Allan pointed out it's a very intense process, because of the historical value of absolutely everything you have to be so careful. Normally you're trying to make improvements but you can't stray too far away because you have to be completely stuck to a rigid set of boundaries to work to. Whereas with this, we had absolute freedom to do whatever we wanted really, just to make it sound as good and as raw as possible. One of the things when you listen to the original Let It Be there is that element of the fly on the wall thing, because you hear the tape starting up, you hear the comments. But our thought was that compared to all the other albums it was a bit like an extension of the film - but with this we wanted to make a really good album. As in these are the songs; we're not going to have clapping at the end or whatever. It was just let's just make this a really strong Beatles album to go with the others. And because of the nature of when it was recorded, there are certain things on the tracks where if they're not playing, they're making noises and stuff. So one of the first things we did was to go through it all track by track and just clean it up; clean up the little pops or when they're moving around between the takes you can hear on the original. We basically made every track completely clear."

Allan Rouse: "In my view there's two things about an album, there's two experiences you get; you get the experience of the music and the songs, which you love, and you get the audio experience. And this is the one thing, the major alteration, that's changed, the audio experience - to make it sound good anyway but also to extend its life because we all listen to things totally different from how we did 30 years ago. If you take the early Beatles recordings, a lot of people think it's a great novelty to have a vocal coming out of the left speaker and the drums coming out of the right. But kids today don't understand it. It's `why?' So all of these aspects of remixing the album which we've used for other projects, the whole purpose behind it in this instance was besides the fact that it's a completely unique album, was to make all these improvements that Paul and Guy can do to make it sound like a much more exciting audio experience. It is a new version of the album. It had to feel the same but it had to sound better. We were given very little information as to what was expected with this album, but I think we all knew what was wanted. And it could only really be achieved by taking a blank canvas and starting again. That's basically the way it was. And that's why, at no point, did we really reference to Glynn Johns' mix or Phil Spector's, because there was no need to. That wasn't the purpose."


Guy Massey
Guy Massey


While the project was obviously approved by Ringo Starr, George Harrison (who unfortunately never got to hear the final mix) and Yoko Ono, it was Paul McCartney who seems to have championed the remixing the most. McCartney revelled in the opportunity to strip Phil Spector's strings and choirs from his song The Long And Winding Road, a source of major aggravation to him over the years.

Paul McCartney: "At least in the past if you were gonna put strings on it someone would run the arrangement past me. And I'd say great, or not great, or fix it. It was not being consulted, then putting out what I thought was.. crap."

Paul Hicks: "Really the thing is that most of the tracks are the same takes as what people have known before; the absolute obvious change is The Long And Winding Road - it was a very different version that Phil Spector over-dubbed on and when going through it all we discovered that the version that's on the film, the one that they did on the last day, that we felt had a really good sort of sentiment and the emotion was just fantastic. Just the playing of the drums and Paul's vocal on that are great and it really suits it. That's the stand-out different one."

Allan Rouse: "One of the biggest problems we had was that the lyrics changed. It was only a small, subtle change. Once we realized that the lyric had changed we then had this quandary as to whether or not this was acceptable now, because this was something really, really obvious. It's one thing having a different take, but you expect the lyrics to be the same because otherwise God knows what people might assume. The conclusion we came to in this instance was that, because it was the very last take that he probably ever did, therefore it was probably more correct. So that's how we resolved our problem, we figured that Paul had tuned his lyrics and that was probably what he really wanted. But then Phil or Glyn use the take that was done beforehand and, of course, that's how those lyrics became set.
The instrumentation which starts all at the beginning doesn't necessarily start at the beginning in our version. In other words we've done little subtle things to build a song. Guy did the same thing in Across The Universe. If we felt it needed a build we wouldn't necessarily have everything in from the beginning. Across The Universe is probably the best example. Guy did Across The Universe and he had a bit of a problem there, because he had two tracks. And that was all. On track one was guitar and vocal, John singing, and the only other thing that was played live was tambora. And that was it. Yoko's heard it and thinks it's beautiful, so that's fine, but the point was that all that was running from beginning to end was John playing guitar, singing, and tambora. Guy has done various things to the tambora and changed the overall sound of the tambora throughout the structure of the song, to build it, to change the concept of it - because otherwise you're missing so much from that song with just those two things going on. There were loads of overdubs on top of that. And that was it, all the way through. I was just thinking about the irony of that, we spend a year and a half getting rid of the sound of Phil Spector and then we go and put a tape delay and then a reverb right on the end of it. It's just a little present to Phil Spector, so he doesn't feel completely left out."

Yoko Ono: "It is a very major song, but never had a home, so to speak, until now.”"


Paul Hicks
Paul Hicks


Guy Massey: "Well, there wasn't a lot that we could do with it, really. We stereoized the tambora as it was building, we had it in mono first and then for the first chorus we opened it out so it was stereo. We did the same with the vocals, widened it out a little. And then Alan suggested why doesn't it all fade into beautiful reverb at the end; so we all laughed, did it, and it sounded great. Originally we thought that was going to be the end track on the album, just a lovely thing to go out on, just disappear on it. But then when we did the running order it didn't flow quite as well, so we put Let It Be last, which seemed to fit as well. Again, we just wanted it to build, so we started it as it does start, pretty quietly and then we just introduced bits and arranged it a bit more than it had been previously

If the champion of this particular project was Paul, it's title - LET IT BE... NAKED - was apparently Ringo's. Both Beatles went to Abbey Road to the inspect the engineer's work.

Paul McCartney: "Whereas Winston Churchill's papers get older and browner and crinklier, with modern technology the Beatles' music gets less hissier, gets shinier, gets more audible. And you've got these four guys - five with Billy Preston, at times - in this room with you know, sort of 5.1 [Dolby Surround Sound] and it's quite uncanny, quite the opposite of how history normally goes. It's getting better all the time. I Love it, because it shows you what The Beatles were like underneath it all. We were a great little band. I remember sitting in a rather bare white room in the Sixties listening to [the original master] and being almost scared by it because it was so naked and thinking, this is certainly unadorned and to put this out would be quite a break."

Paul Hicks: "When we sifted through the tracks we basically took anything that was an overdub. It's what they were playing. I Me Mine is an exception."

Allan Rouse: "I think it's important to recognize that it is the take with overdubs because some people might start saying `I thought this was meant to be without overdubs, but it's got loads of overdubs on it'. But you have to understand that we couldn't pare down what was there; it didn't have a vocal anyway, the backing track if you like. Because even the vocal was really a guide vocal and he overdubbed that on I Me Mine.

Guy Massey: "I think there was only two of them playing on the original take, I think it was just drums and guitar."

Paul Hicks: "Let It Be; we used the original guitar solo that George did because he overdubbed the solo.It's the same one that's in the film and he just looks like he's enjoying it."

Paul Hicks: "Get Back, that's basically as it's been heard before. But it's a studio take and what they did on the original album was they added the audience and an ending to make it sound live. But Get Back's essentially always been a studio performance. And, again to just keep the album feel of it and because it is what was on the original, we haven't got the ending, the reprise, that you'd heard before. It turns out that the coda had been recorded as an edit piece four or five reels later. Since it wasn't on the original session recording for the song, it wouldn't have represented what actually took place in the studio during that take, so it was decided to leave it off. Now it's compact. It's two and a half minutes and just punchy and sounding exciting. And that was done by remixing and just cleaning it up, removing noise and hiss and the limitations of the speakers in those days. In cleaning up the tracks it meant cleaning up wind noise and some hum and also you have to remember that there were film crews around, they didn't know if that would be the take so there were people making noises. In stripping it back we have had to do a few little edits, to avoid actually changing things. Dig A Pony; that's from the rooftop, as was the original."

Guy Massey: "Basically we just cleaned it up; there was lots of popping on the vocals. Phil Spector did some edits that we re-did, they made sense."

Paul Hicks: "Two Of Us, we've used the same take and not a lot of editing done on that, just a straightforward remix.

Starr's drums were typically recorded onto a single track, precluding mixing them into stereo. Small amounts of de-essing and rumble filtering were also performed on Two Of Us.

Paul Hicks: I've Got A Feeling is an interesting track; I've Got A Feeling is the rooftop performance - the rooftop tracks, by the way, are I've Got A Feeling, Dig A Pony, The One After 909 and Don't Let Me Down. I've Got A Feeling is actually quite different than has been heard before; that's the one on which we did a lot of work to get the most exciting bits out of the two takes that were on the rooftop. I've Got A Feeling is a mixture of the two rooftop performances; it's a completely new edit. We basically got the best out of both of the two takes that they did. That'll be a field day for people to try and work out what it is. It is embracing today's technology. It was just block multi-track edits, just `that verse is better than that one'. On one of the takes the guitar was really distorted and very exciting, I love the excitement of I've Got A Feeling; with Paul just screaming away on it it's a really good moment on the album."

Paul Hicks: "Next, One After 909 - again, taken from the rooftop which was also used on the original album but now one of the main improvements is the drum clarity. No edits there, it's pretty naked. We did research to see if there was another version, but it was just much slower, and it had a completely different feel. There was no contest, really. It's one of the more up-tempo numbers, so we went with the live one. We found so many details we wanted to bring out, which we tried our best to do. Everything is a lot more focused.”

Paul Hicks: "For Your Blue; that's just a matter of getting more clarity, really. It was a really good recording on that one, actually; really clear and crisp and we took advantage of that and, like Get Back, just tried to make it as punchy as possible. PH: There's really not much that can be said about that track; it's hopefully a bit clearer. We noticed that Paul's doing like a weird piano sound that he got by putting paper in it. You know that weird little percussive sound in it, that's basically Paul playing the piano that's been muted, so it's got that percussive sound. Again, all we've tried to do is to get it so that you can hear all those elements You can hear on the session tape Paul's fiddling around, trying to get the right sound. We took out his (George's) live vocal, which was basically a guide vocal. It wasn't a complete take, really, and I don't think it was ever intended to be used.”

Billy Preston: "I liked the original but I'm looking forward to this one. I'm excited about hearing it and I'm glad they're putting it out again. It was great for me, to be invited to play. And they treated me as a member of the band, which was fantastic."

Not everybody in the Beatles camp was happy at first. Yoko ono refers to one early mix of a Lennon track as a "sorry sight" that had to be fixed. By the time the project was finished, her official opinion was that the album was "really beautiful". But what John have thought of the project as a whole?

Yoko Ono: "I think because he had an experimental nature, he would have liked the idea of bringing out something different. The original is there, it didn’t disappear. This is not an improvement, it’s a different version. Paul did not get to do this version the first time around, and it is karmically good for all of us that we are bringing this one out now.”

Allan Rouse: "We actually spent a long time, the three of us, to get the right running order. It's completely different and I think it makes you want to listen to the album more. For instance, One After 909 now starts within split seconds of the track before it. If you think about Beatles albums or any album recorded in the Sixties with the exception of albums like ABBEY ROAD, there was always three seconds between each track. It didn't matter how it felt, you just measured three seconds of white leader and stuck it in. But we didn't do that because people don't do that anymore, people use feel for when the next track should come in. All of this is slightly different to the usual Beatles album. The album length has hardly changed, despite the fact that we took Dig Itand Maggie Mae out and all the dialogue, because Don't Let Me Down wasn't on the original album and that has made up the difference. This is the same length as The Beatles first four albums, practically. We were worried about that. When CD first came out and people realized they could put 80 minutes of music on a disc, I think some thought they had to put on 80 minutes, or at least 75."

Allan Rouse: "One of the things that is very comforting for us in all of this, by the way, is that Ringo appeared to be really knocked out after he first heard the new album, he became very vocal about it. And then we heard that Paul was really knocked out too, so that made it all matter."

McCartney has also been cagy about whether he will revisit any more Beatle albums in this way.

Paul McCartney: "I dunno. I started thinking about MAGICAL MYSTERY TOUR, don't know why. But like I say, we've done with it. I love the idea that when you get a project like this then John is suddenly right there on that 5.1 and it's exciting for me. Close your eyes and it's exactly like being in Abbey Road making those records. Only, there's no hiss. And you can't argue with that cause there was no hiss in the room where we made it, so it's taking it back to the reality in many ways. I haven't particularly thought of revisiting anything else but an idea might come up. To anyone who's worried - well then, get the original record. Be a collector, get the vinyl copy. Cause it's all still out there, it hasn't gone away."




Sources include: Washington Post Sunday 24 November 2002; Word Music And More December 2003; Mix : The Naked Truth About The Beatles; Rolling Stone 29 January 2003 - New Beatles "Let It Be" Due; Plugged : Sir Paul and Ringo Discuss Let It Be...Naked



Last Entry : 2000 Release
Main Contents
Next Entry : 2002 Mixing Session